Saturday, January 30, 2010
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Bridge Studies
Columns at .13M, 25 / side
Columns at .13M, 12 / side (just to see)
Columns at .033M diameter, 25 / side.
Lets make this happen. Oh and this last image has a simple box profile as opposed to the other two which are tapered.
See Scott's "Steel Box Girder - More Cross Section Sketches" post.
Labels:
2 Bridge,
renderings,
structure,
studies
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Gallery Studies Cluster Village
Kinda looks like the city.
Basically Louvre Lens - or the galleries of Kanazawa - bunched together, and with the exhibition spaces of all the programs on the second level.
Or I guess Towada without the hallways.
What other SANAA projects can it resemble?
Though the plan needs to allow for more access from the perimeter to the center, like slimer.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Gallery Studies Hills in Water
When I was toying with that rendered model I accidentally shaved off too much at the bottom, making it look like as if the tide had come in and started filling in around the hills, or something like that.
This could be a good way to not only bring people into the center but bring people onto the roof, say at grade with street E, using street E as the tide datum. Get it? You get it.
Its not as extroverted as the splat/flower/blob profile, but the program and circulation would work the same way. Also nice that you keep a clean edge along the site bounds.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Grid of Girders / Beams
Would there be any benefit - i.e. thinner - to have multiple lines of beams/girder running the length of the bridge with tranverse beams when necessary? Basically like the KAIT roof structure, or the SANAA Ferry Terminal.
And a bridge with columns!
Labels:
2 Bridge,
fritz leonhardt,
precedents,
structure
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Steel Box Girder - More Cross Section Sketches
We could do a single steel box girder like these. This provides a wider area on the bottom for the scattered columns to connect to.
Labels:
2 Bridge,
box girder,
precedents,
steel
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Concrete Deck
We could use this super-concrete for the deck. Thoughts?
Ductal is a proprietary pre-mixed ultra-high performance concrete with high compressive strength, high tensile strength and high durability together with high fatigue performance.
The Footbridge of Peace Seoul, Korea
Span 120 m (400 ft)
Height 15 m (45 ft)
Bridge deck thickness 3 cm (1¼")
Bridge deck width 4.3 m (17 ft)
Depth of cross-section 1.1 m (4 ft)
Total Ductal mass 220 tonnes (240 tons)
Passive reinforcement 0
Pre-stressed reinforcement 12 tonnes (13.2 tons)
Sherbrooke Bridge, Quebec
Constructed with Ductal, this pedestrian bridge spans 60 m (190 ft) with a deck thickness of just 3 cm (1¼").
This project features several technological innovations:
Absence of passive reinforcements
Miniaturized pre-stressing
Diagonals in confined Ductal
More on Ductal: Technical Library, more and mooore.
Ductal is a proprietary pre-mixed ultra-high performance concrete with high compressive strength, high tensile strength and high durability together with high fatigue performance.
The Footbridge of Peace Seoul, Korea
Span 120 m (400 ft)
Height 15 m (45 ft)
Bridge deck thickness 3 cm (1¼")
Bridge deck width 4.3 m (17 ft)
Depth of cross-section 1.1 m (4 ft)
Total Ductal mass 220 tonnes (240 tons)
Passive reinforcement 0
Pre-stressed reinforcement 12 tonnes (13.2 tons)
Sherbrooke Bridge, Quebec
Constructed with Ductal, this pedestrian bridge spans 60 m (190 ft) with a deck thickness of just 3 cm (1¼").
This project features several technological innovations:
Absence of passive reinforcements
Miniaturized pre-stressing
Diagonals in confined Ductal
More on Ductal: Technical Library, more and mooore.
Labels:
2 Bridge,
materials,
pedestrian bridge,
precedents,
structure,
studies
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Codes
This is from 'Designing for accessibilty' - UK version ( whole book: http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/C53C7118-21A1-4A25-896E-D9726C992634/0/10983designforaccessibilityguideupdated.pdf ).
I didn't find any specific slovenian standards but, as in the case of the steel construction standards, i think it's safe to use european standards(members of EU are encouraged to use EU standards until they adapt their own standards to EU level).
More details on ramps here.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)